April 11, 2013
by Nick Ottens
0 comments
Last month, I supervised a Wikistrat simulation that asked analysts to describe how Russian president Vladimir Putin might fall before his third term expires in 2018. The Prague Post, where I write mainly about European and Russian energy relations and politics, was interested in the exercise so I wrote an article for them about the simulation’s findings.
The consensus that emerged from the different scenarios that were proposed by the analysts was that Putin’s fall would likely be triggered by some external crisis, like a foreign policy blunder or a sharp reduction in Russian oil and gas exports, that convinces other members of the regime that the president has become a threat to their own survival.
Throughout his thirteen years in power, Putin has built a coalition of conservatives and relative liberals who reflect his own hawkish foreign policy views, grounded in Russia’s self-interest, and penchant for “managed democracy” in combination with free market economic policies. While the moderates would prefer to pursue a more pro-Western diplomacy, the conservatives do not particularly care for a further liberalization of Russia’s economy. Putin has managed to balance these interests, but if a crisis happens, the two groups could fight for supremacy—and come to regard Putin as a liability.
The outcome would likely be prolonged political instability, maybe an army coup, before a new government is tasked “with simultaneously placating urban middle class voters’ demands for true democratization and the Russian masses’ longing for stability—opposing desires that Putin himself has so far failed to reconcile.”
Read the whole article online.